Friday, December 19, 2014

The Rapture [Part 23].

Tom's Journal. http://tomschuckmanjournal.blogspot.com/

tschuckman@aol.com

I met and heard Norman Geisler at a Waukesha, WI., Seminar about 20 years ago, and enjoyed his informative talk at that time.   A fine lady,  Mary Ellen Hintz, helped me exit the JW cult at that time...   the 'church of the poisoned mind' group...  the WatchTower and Tract Society in New York, that has a strangle hold on millions of people.   Those folks hate me for telling the truth about  their Org., and how they mislead people and control them from cradle to grave.   They have 'blood guilt' on their hands for sending so many people to hell with their lies,  but then 'Main Line Christendom Churches' also bare much guilt for watering down the truth of the Bible/ Gospel, so that most people in the churches don't even know the basics of the Bible truth !   Anyone with an average IQ can open the Bible and understand it, with the help of the H.S. [Holy Spirit] !!    Mere children can learn and understand it !!  
      Romans 1: 16 says,   " For I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ:  for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth, to the Jew first, and also to the Greek."    A month ago I bought a bunch of sew on patches with cool Christian proverbs, etc., that my wife, Terri sewed onto my T-shirts, etc., to get people thinking about spiritual things.   I LOOK FOR WAYS TO WITNESS, AND SHARE THE GOSPEL WITH ALL FOLKS THAT I COME INTO CONTACT WITH WHEN EVER I AM OUT AND ABOUT, AND ALWAYS KEEP A FEW BIBLE TRACTS IN MY WALLET TO SHARE WITH PEOPLE.  I plant 'seeds' in people's minds and hearts, and it make sme feel good inside !  
     The dirty old devil constantly tries to 'trip me up' and also plant bad thoughts and temptations in my mind, hoping to take me out of the Gospel sharing business with feelings of guilt and worthlessness,  but the Grace of God ought to be sufficient to keep me on track.  Just think:  one of these days the Rapture WILL COME, and unexpectedly, catching so many people with their pants down !!   There are so many temptations in our immoral world right now, and things will only get worse.   We need to help each other, pray hard, email, talk, phone, visit each other as much as possible, IMHO.  

Warm Regards,
Tom


December 19, 2014

The Rapture (Part 23)

Andy Woods
Dr. Andy Woods Sugar Land Bible Church
My previous articles commenced a series on the rapture of the church. We began with the question, "What is the Rapture?" This question can best be answered by noting ten truths about the rapture from 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 and 1 Corinthians 15:50-58. We then moved to a second main question, namely, when will the rapture take place relative to the coming seven-year Tribulation period? We offered the contention that believers can develop certainty that they will be raptured before the Tribulation period occurs for at least seven reasons. Now that we have dealt with these two questions, we began to explore some of the weaknesses associated with the other competing views that seek to answer the question, "when will the rapture take place relative to the coming Tribulation period?" At least five differing perspectives exist. We noted at the onset that it is important to understand that all of the non-pre-tribulation positions have a difficult time handling the seven arguments favoring pre-tribulationalism previously discussed in this series. We have already noted the problems associated with mid-tribulationalism. In the last article we began to scrutinize the arguments favoring post-tribulationalism. In this article, we will continue to scrutinize post-tribulationalism.
Post Tribulation

Post-Tribulation Rapture

Post-tribulation rapture theory contends that the rapture will take place at the end of the coming Tribulation period. This view typically sees no distinction between the rapture and the Second Advent and thus seeks to harmonize all references to Christ's return as taking place at the end of the future Tribulation period. Those adhering to the post-tribulation rapture typically rely on at least one of four arguments to support their position. In our last article, we noted that post-tribulationism errs in superficially connecting Paul's depiction of the rapture (1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:50-58) with the events of Matthew 24:30-31. We now move on to the second argument that post-tribulationalists use to support their view.
2. According to Revelation 20:4-6, the resurrection of all believers will transpire at the end of the Tribulation period thereby necessitating that the rapture will also take place at this time. These verses say, "Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years." Post-tribulationalist George Eldon Ladd even goes so far as to assert that these verses represent the only New Testament passage pointing to the time of the rapture. [1] The simplest response to this assertion is that the resurrection spoken of in these verses is speaking only of the resurrection of the Tribulation martyrs. Revelation 20:4 clarifies exactly which resurrection is in view when it says, "And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years" (italics added). Thus, Geisler explains, "Revelation 20:4-6 is speaking of the believers who have died during the Tribulation, not those resurrected at the Rapture" (1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:50-58). [2]
Moreover, the superficial points of similarity that seemingly unite Paul's presentation of the rapture (1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:50-58) with Revelation 20:4-6 are outweighed by a vast difference that distinguishes these sections of Scripture from one another. Although Revelation 20:4-6 does speak of a resurrection of deceased saints, it says nothing about a translation and resurrection of living saints as Paul emphasizes in his discussion of the rapture. For example, Paul's rapture presentation uses terminology such as "we who are alive and remain" (1 Thess. 4:15, 17) and "we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed" (1 Cor. 15:50). Such phrases are not found in Revelation 20:4-6. Thus, Ryrie observes, "...Revelation 20:4 speaks only of a resurrection of the dead, not of a translation of living people, a truth that is prominent and a vital part of the other descriptions of the rapture in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 and 1 Corinthians 15:51-58)." [3]
If Revelation 20:4-6 is not speaking of the rapture of the church and if the church's rapture already transpired before this resurrection predicted by John takes place, then why is it called "the first resurrection" (Rev. 20:5-6)? When John mentioned "the first resurrection" in Revelation 20:5b, he had in mind merely that this resurrection will occur before the final resurrection for all unbelievers that will transpire at the end of Christ's one-thousand year reign (Rev. 20:5a). He was not referring to the first resurrection ever in human history. Indeed, John could not have in mind the first resurrection ever since such a proposition would also mean that even Christ's resurrection would not count as a bonafide resurrection! John's use of the word "first" in Revelation 20:5-6 was only in reference to the first in a series rather than the first ever. Such a method of communication would be the equivalent of my wife telling me that she was "first" going to go the grocery store and then "last" she was going to drop off the laundry. Here, she would be using the word "first" only relative to "last" going to drop off the laundry. She would not be saying this would be her first time ever that she had gone to the grocery store. John uses the word "first" in the same sense in Revelation 20:5-6.
In sum, having previously answered the question, "What is the rapture?", we noted at least seven reasons that affirm the pre-tribulational rapture view. We then began interacting with the other positions on the timing of the rapture. In this article, we have observed that post-tribulationism errs in superficially connecting Paul's depiction of the rapture (1 Thess. 4:13-18; 1 Cor. 15:50-58) with the first resurrection in Revelation 20:4-6.
(To Be Continued...)
Endnotes
[1] George Eldon Ladd, The Blessed Hope (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1956), 165.
[2] Norman L. Geisler, Systematic Theology, vol. 4 (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany, 2004), 654.
[3] Charles C. Ryrie, What You Should Know About the Rapture, Current Christian Issues (Chicago