Thursday, August 8, 2013

Do We the People really have a Constitution?

Tom's Journal.

Hi Friends,
I HOPE that I am not violating any promises or agreements with the TPP's Org, but one fellow who is very intelligent about the US Constitution had this piece to say today,  and I just want to forward/ post it so that others might have this food for thought also. 
    The question IS:   'Do we really have the US Constitution anymore ??  Have we already LOST THE WAR, in deed??'   Because,  if we just have that enshrined hallowed document in D.C. --- but it's now invalid,  where does that leave us all ?   Ha!  These words of that fine, smart gentleman SCARED ME just now !   I want to know, if it's true...  how do YOU ALL feel about it?  And I feel that I too am too woefully ignorant and need to 'bone up' -- learn more about the Constitution and our Laws of the Land ! 

I wanted to close with, "Warm Regards,"  --But I am tempted to say, 'Good Luck', except that I don't believe in "luck."   I, Tom Schuckman,  believe in hard, honest work, and following the Word of God  [the KJV Bible!].   It's like our Tax Code system, and our Health Care system, and the VA system.   If you don't know those Organizations -- you'd better GET to know them, or hire someone that does.  As with Obama-care,  our Congress and Senate don't even know it, or have ever read it !!  And now, no body wants it !   The Congress just voted themselves exempt -- right before they 'bolted out the door for a month of recess/ vacation!'  Isn't that cute ?  Smile!   Maybe they know something that we don't.     Has just ONE Congressman come forth to explain any part of this abandonment ?    Call me, if you know, or reach me by email, please. 

The gentleman goes by an alias -- so maybe I am safe....  today.

Tom Schuckman

Permalink Reply by Quisno son of the republic 22 minutes ago
the Constitution is dead. You see the police state as it has formed. people must find communities to fashion our needed life styles working together  as people in groups to survive this coming calamite. The enumeration of powers in the federal document was to control the nature of those elected to lead not the people it was meant to service. in 1833 Chief Justice John marshal wrote  that the Bill of Rights is a state document and controls the nature of the State where the citizen resides. And since then we the people have been trying to put it back into the Constitution.
The Federal government was never meant to be the final word. Again we the people gave that to our federal government. Today we labor under our own ignorance to the plan that our Founders made available to us.
So i began several sites  Constitutional Sheriffs posse and Constitutional Sheriffs in which i made available documents to the 48 States where Sheriffs are placed in this nation. Keith Broaders and Sheriff mac took that information and ran with here in Idaho my original documents still reside and i have placed it in here  several times in posts that i have made.
I'm not hereto persuade anyone  anymore im here to monitor the health of the people awakened to the facts. I Have my communities I mine  to acquire down the road money to be used in my next quest. the operation of unincorporated groups to bring the truth of State citizenship to the forefront. For now 99% of you are federal citizens therefore not state citizens as the 14th amendment as well as Social Security have removed most from the State Citizenship with rights to Federal Citizens with only a mandated promise that your rights would be observed. today  what are rights when the DHS can remove the Constitution from an area 100 miles wide around the boundaries of this nation.
Now I ask you if a corridor can be placed around this nation with out Constitutional rights being in place do  we  now  have a Government which enumerates our rights  and controls our ability to have those rights?       And a health care which is a taxing agent.

A lot of money being spent to keep a secret.

Tom's Journal.

mind, again

Whistleblower: Obama Was Indonesian Citizen & Given Financial Aid As Foreign Student At Occidental College

Obama_OccidentalA whistle-blower from Higher Education Services Corporation in Albany New York came forward and advised Attorney Orly Taitz that she personally reviewed Barack Obama’s financial aid information, which stated that financial aid was given to Obama as foreign student and as a citizen of Indonesia.
In the original case there were over 100 pages that documented that Barack Obama was a citizen of Indonesia at the time he attended Occidental and that he has used fraudulent means to secure Identification.
However, Superior Court Judge Charles Marginis ruled in favor of Occidental College and denied Taitz’s motion to force them to produce Obama’s college registration forms.
Kathleen O’Leary, the Chief Judge of the Fourth District Court of Appeals, then re-instated the appeal.
In Taitz’s press release she writes, “Additionally, Obama failed to submit the Appellee’s brief in Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emken. This is an appeal, which was reinstated by the Chief Judge of the Fourth District Court of Appeal Kathleen O’Leary. Appellant Taitz filed her Appellant’s brief.”
“Appellees failed to file an Appellees’ brief,” the press release continued. “They were given additional 15 days and they failed again. Attorney Taitz submitted a notice of failure by Appellees to file an Appellee’s brief and provided the court with this additional information, as part of the appeal revolves around the decision by the Superior Court judge Charles Marginis to rule in favor of the Occidental college and deny a motion to compel production of a redacted college registration for Obama in light of over a 100 pages of records showing Obama to be a citizen of Indonesia using forged and fraudulently obtained IDs.”
As a result, Taitz submitted the new information to the Superior Court claiming “Whistleblower wrote for Taitz in her own handwriting her first and last name, her work e-mail address, her personal e-mail address and her home and cell phone numbers.”

“Taitz did her due diligence and independently verified that the whistleblower is indeed employed by the Higher Education Services Corporation in Albany, New York” Taitz’s submittal read. “She further checked that Obama transferred from the Occidental college to Columbia University in New York and his financial aid would indeed be handled by the Higher Education Services Corporation in Albany, New York (Hereinafter HESC). Whistleblower advised Taitz that the policy of the HESC is no to destroy records and microfilm is contained in the safe of the corporation. She further advised Taitz that several employees of the HESC made copies of the microfilm, in case the management decides to destroy the evidence. She came forward, as she is concerned about fraud being committed and the fact that as a citizen of Indonesia Obama was not eligible to be the president of the United States.”
A sword declaration was also attached, as you can see here.
Ms. Taitz say that the information provided should weigh in her favor in granting an appeal. Moreover, if further evidence confirms this information and attorney for Occidental college knew that Obama’s registration, application and financial aid show him registered as a foreign student and a citizen of Indonesia, then they would have knowingly been committing treason against the people of the United States of America and were aiding and abetting the most egregious fraud in the history of the US.
I wonder why those who have made copies of the microfilm have not simply pitched it into the hands of someone like Taitz. In either case, I’m sure the Obama administration has put its NSA ears to the ground around HESC now and employees can rest assured they are being monitored.
Barack Obama has spent millions of dollars to keep his records from the public eye? Why? Isn’t he the man that said, “The only people that don’t want to disclose the truth, are people with something to hide?” Again, how hard is it for Obama to simply produce the documentation, not a forged digital image on the web, and put to rest the allegations? If I were in the position, that’s exactly what I would do and demonstrate the foolishness of the claim, but when someone goes to great expense and lengths to keep information hidden, it only lends credibility to the charges leveled against him, especially in light of his past and his time in office.
Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost and a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline.
Follow The D.C. Clothesline on Facebook

This entry was posted in Barack Obama and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
The Daily Jot 

NOTE: When writing about God and Jesus, The Daily Jot means YHVH as God and Yeshua Ha Mashiach as Jesus--the actual original names and the true nature and character of them.

ADDRESS CHANGE: The Daily Jot has moved. Please update your address book.

The Daily Jot
5257 Buckeystown Pike #314
Frederick, Md 21704

Thursday, August 8, 2013  

Only "targeted Americans" are spied on, really?
The New York Times has dedicated over 1,500 words to explaining what the NSA is doing to protect the privacy of the Americans it spies on. The story goes into how the NSA distinguishes between a "targeted" person and "eavesdropping" on domestic soil for data collection purposes. The story says that a "target" (for NSA purposes) must be a foreign individual. Yet the data collection dragnet on phone and email records extends far beyond "targets." Meantime, Reuters has reported that an IRS manual instructs investigators to alter the investigative trail--meaning to cover up how investigations begin--of data collected on Americans and shared with the FBI, DEA, NSA and CIA.

In other words, it is written policy that these internal unconstitutional spy agencies can rewrite the beginnings of an investigation--its purpose, how they received the information, their intent on collecting it, etc. This means that any one--you, me, our family--can be accused of some wrong doing and the government can and actually does "recreate" the case to convict you. That is how, in my case for example, a supposed "FBI Agent" can come to my door with accusations that I was taking pictures of oil refineries in Delaware on April 16 while driving a red Camry. While I never have driven a red Camry, was not in Delaware on April 16, it makes no difference. It's government evidence and I would have to prove my innocence rather than being innocent until proven guilty.

The Fourth Amendment reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." This is a very specific Constitutional edict. No law can replace it, add to it, or take away from it. It is supreme because it is in our Constitution. Yet, politically correct evildoers have set the Constitution and the American people in a large pot of lukewarm legalese and have fired it up to a bubbling boil. When will we see the deadly danger in it?

The deadly danger in it is that these unconstitutional agencies are allowed to do whatever they need to do to frame someone if they desire to do so. It is unconstitutional. It is also a threat to every Christian believer. Jesus said in John 15:20, "Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also." Yes, persecution like you have never seen is on the horizon. This nation, however, was founded in part that our Christian religious freedom would not be infringed. In that, this nation under God would continue to be a light onto the world. Should we just throw up our hands and say because persecution is prophesied, we should just cave in to the forces of evil to bring it on? Really?
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
Bill Wilson

PS. Please use the forward link below to pass this on to as many people as you can!    
NOTICE: If you would like to forward this message to others, please use the Forward This Issue link.  
Otherwise recipients who receive it and don't appreciate it may unknowingly unsubscribe you
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!  - Bill Wilson,  The Daily Jot
Join the "200 Club"  
by committing to support this ministry with $25 a month.   Click Here to support the DAILY JOT via secure online donations.
Have a Blessed and Powerful Day!
- Bill Wilson, Daily