Monday, November 9, 2009

Swine Flu Vaccine Dangerous.

Tom's Journal.
http://tomschuckmanjournal.blogspot.com/
tschuckman@aol.com

I know too much about the Gov't in the USA, and judging by what I have seen in obama's Socialist system-- I would not trust him farther than I could spit. My wife and I will NEVER take that 'Pig Flu shot !' I welcome my 90 day [long needled] shots in both knees for acute, bone on bone arthritis and the fellow who does it is not only a fine professional, but also my friend. He watches out for his patients.
Be wise -- do your home work, please.

Bless all 'believers' and help spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Jesus is Lord.

Tom Schuckman
tschuckman@aol.com
Hey! The Green Bay Packers' quarter back got sacked 5 times, again on Sunday! That is what they get for selling out Bret Farve.... LOL. Fire the coach and GM! It's not that I love the Vikings so much -- it's just that I like to see sweet justice get done once in a blue moon.

This email you need to read ...............a big warning ............please do take the time to read this!!!!


I'm a qualified pharmacist. I've been researching the swine flu vaccine that our government has bought for us (using our money, by the way) and it's DANGEROUS AS. It's easy a hundred times more dangerous than the swine flu itself.

Something that freaked me out is that several swine flu vaccine manufacturers have asked governments to give them an exemption from lawsuits, in case the vaccine caused harm in people. If you made a vaccine that you knew worked, then why would you need a legal exemption in case it hurt people? Massive warning sign - they don't believe its safe!

The swine flu itself has killed about 2/3000 people total. The regular flu kills 40 000 plus per year – so why are we freaking out about swine flu, and not normal flu? Does that make sense? No!

If the regular flu kills 40 000 plus per year, and the swine flu only killed 2/3 000 – then why are governments buying it in advance, giving it to us for free, and giving drug manufacturers immunity to legal cases against them? Does that make sense? No!

The swine flu vaccine contains 2 horribly dangerous compounds – one is called thimerosol. It is made 50% ofmercury. It binds to receptors in your brain, and basically causes brain damage. Is it smart to be injected with thimerosol, and get brain damage, dropping 10 IQ points and going dumb, in order to avoid getting a flu that kills 95% less people than regular flu? No!

The other horrible ingredient is called squalene. Squalene accidentally tricks your immune system into killing your own cells, which creates auto-immune diseases like asthma, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and a bunch of diseases that we don't have a name for yet (because squalene hasn't been used for that long, and we have little data on its effects) – is is smart to inject yourself with that stuff, in order to avoid a relatively mild flu, like the swine flu? No!

If you're a pregnant mother about to take Panvax, ask yourself this – why would you take Panvax, when it contains Neomycin and Polymyxin B Sulfate – both of which exhibit positive risk to unborn children – so as to avoid what? A mild flu, that kills 95% fewer people than the regular flu?

Look, I'm a funny guy. Yeah, I make good Facebook groups. People join them by the thousands, and laugh. But I'm also a qualified pharmacist. I scored in the top 0.1% of my state in school. I'm an expert at critical analysis of drugs and their effects on humans. And let me be blunt – if someone came up to me with a syringe full of swine flu vaccine, or came near my family with one – I would take the needle off them and poke them with it myself – followed by several very hard punches.

This stuff is poison. Don't take it. Don't let your friends take it. Don't let your family take it. If some idiot in a lab coat asks you if you want it, ask them about thimerosol, squalene, and why the company making it wants legal exemption from being sued, and watch their face go into "Oh, my God! I'm being asked serious questions that I don't have the answer to” mode.

Anyway. I hope you're all well. Chat to you on Facebook sometime...

Sincerely,

George Mamouzellos
Bachelor of Pharmacy
University of South Australia

FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click Here!




__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4580 (20091106) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

part000.txt - is OK
part001.htm - is OK

http://www.eset.com

Bush had more honor.

Tom's Journal.
http://tomschuckmanjournal.blogspot.com/
tschuckman@aol.com

Look Friends and Readers:
I am the first to admit that I voted for G.W. BUSH twice while knowing that the man was human. I also admit that he fell far short of the promises he spoke, like building the fence along the Mexican border and stating that all religions lead to God, etc. BUT, is he so low as obama bribing all kinds of people to PUSH his rotten 'obama-care' bill-- against the majority of the American people ??

And remember the other big thing... obama can't do anything with out the consent of the CONGRESS! I submit that his old Socialist cronies had all this planned on paper from the get go.

Tom





Dick Morris

RSS
Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us

Obamacare Endorsements: What the Bribe Was



As the suicidal Democratic congressmen proceed to rubber-stamp the Obama healthcare reform despite the drubbing their party took in the '09 elections, the president trotted out the endorsements of the AMA and the AARP to stimulate support. But these – and the other endorsements – his package has received are all bought and paid for.

Here are the deals:

  • The American Medical Association (AMA) was facing a 21 percent cut in physicians' reimbursements under the current law. Obama promised to kill the cut if they backed his bill. The cuts are the fruit of a law requiring annual 5 percent to 6 percent reductions in doctor reimbursements for treating Medicare patients. Bravely, each year Congress has rolled the cuts over, suspending them but not repealing them. So each year, the accumulated cuts threaten doctors. By now, they have risen to 21 percent. With this blackmail leverage, Obama compelled the AMA to support his bill...or else!

    Special: Get Sarah Palin’s New Book – Incredible FREE Offer -- Click Here Now.

  • The AARP got a financial windfall in return for its support of the healthcare bill. Over the past decade, the AARP has morphed from an advocacy group to an insurance company (through its subsidiary company). It is one of the main suppliers of Medi-gap insurance, a high-cost, privately purchased coverage that picks up where Medicare leaves off. But President Bush-43 passed the Medicare Advantage program, which offered a subsidized, lower-cost alternative to Medi-gap. Under Medicare Advantage, the elderly get all the extra coverage they need plus coordinated, well-managed care, usually by the same physician. So more than 10 million seniors went with Medicare Advantage, cutting into AARP Medi-gap revenues.

    Presto! Obama solved their problem. He eliminates subsidies for Medicare Advantage. The elderly will have to pay more for coverage under Medigap, but the AARP -- which supposedly represents them -- will make more money. (If this galls you, join the American Seniors Association, the alternative group; contact sbarton@americanseniors.org. This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .)

  • The drug industry backed ObamaCare and, in return, got a 10-year limit of $80 billion on cuts in prescription drug costs. (A drop in the bucket of their almost $3 trillion projected cost over the next decade.) They also got administration assurances that it will continue to bar lower-cost Canadian drugs from coming into the U.S. All it had to do was put its formidable advertising budget at the disposal of the administration.

  • Insurance companies got access to 40 million potential new customers. But when the Senate Finance Committee lowered the fine that would be imposed on those who don't buy insurance from $3,500 to $1,500, the insurance companies jumped ship and now oppose the bill, albeit for the worst of motives.

    The only industry that refused to knuckle under was the medical device makers. They stood for principle and wouldn't go along with Obama's blackmail. So the Senate Finance Committee retaliated by imposing a tax on medical devices such as automated wheelchairs, pacemakers, arterial stents, prosthetic limbs, artificial knees and hips and other necessary accoutrements of healthcare.

    So these endorsements are not freely given, but bought and paid for by an administration that is intent on passing its program at any cost.

    © 2009 Dick Morris & Eileen McGann


  • Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us