CFR ?? Trilateral Comminsion?

Tom's Journal.
http://tomschuckmanjournal.blogspot.com/
tschuckman@aol.com

The VIDEO: Eric Clapton "cocaine" Video

So...... even Rick Warren is a member of the CFR ?? Woo Woo! PTL [Praise the Lord] that the |Holy Spirit gives [real, biblical] Christians the 'power' and faculties to discern a lamb in sheep's clothing.... and special little RED FLAGS go up inside our heads when 'something doesn't sound right.' That what is meant in the book of Hebrews 4: 12, "For the Word of God ]the Bible] is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart." This means that the Bible is the ultimate, last word on deciding weather something is true or false, right or wrong! Period. Otherwise we may well be tossed to and fro by ever goofy, lying wolf who comes along to fatten his wallet on people who are looking for the truth, but are duped by all kinds of tricksters, scam artists, false prophets, etc. This is very important to me because I was really hurting emotionally when I got back from Vietnam in 1970 with PTSD, looking for some truth to get my mind back together-- when I got involved with Jehovah's Witnesses for the next 22 years!!! And they messed me and my family up ROYAL!! Beware, please! And it's not about being dumb, smart,educated of going to a Bible college. Prayer and intense study will give you all the 'tools' you need to discern what is fact and what is fiction or lies when you hear someone talk.
Now, go look up what "CFR" means, and "Trilateral Comminsion." Obama is into this stuff, big time!



Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't just a crisis."

This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

"A 'world government' would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might."

Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.